At present, I am working to complete my PhD in History at the University of Bristol. My research is looking at the environmental impacts of NASA's Apollo/Saturn craft that enabled men to walk on the Moon in the late 1960s and early 70s. In doing this, it will attempt to discover what consideration there was of the environmental side of the missions to our satellite, becoming a vehicle in itself to view the perspectives of 1960s America. As such, it fits into the literature of both environmental history and the history of science and technology, with a 2025 end goal.
Since I was a young boy, I've always been fascinated with space. When I was old enough to have my own room and to choose how it would be decorated, it was only ever going to be covered in space ships. I loved it when Wallace and Gromit went to the Moon. Trips to the Science Museum in London were always a treat, especially to see the space exhibition (and that's still true today). 8-year-old me would be amazed to think that I spend most of my days talking about space, writing about space, and spending time in NASA archives. I have found a little window where two of my loves - history and space - combine.
In 1969, the United States accomplished what is widely regarded to be one of humanity’s greatest and most audacious goals: that of landing humans on the Moon and bringing them back again safely. Much has been written on this topic and it remains something that fascinates our collective interest. The Apollo Program has often been seen as helping to galvanise a fledgling environmental movement thanks to the photos of the Earth taken on the missions – especially the Earthrise and Whole Earth images from Apollos 8 and 17 – but rarely is it discussed what the environmental impact was of the craft that allowed them to be taken.
The main research question for my thesis is to ask whether – and in what ways – NASA considered the environmental impacts of the rockets that took men to the moon in the 1960s and 1970s? I am exploring the material environmental impacts that can be attributed to the rocket at any stage of its life or within some key commodity chains without which the vehicle would not have been possible, which will enable an analysis of the mindset of the time to be evaluated. I am asking how far these environmental impacts went, what factors influenced the degree to which these were felt, and to what extent these were considered by those responsible for program. In doing so, I hope to provide an alternative view of the attitude to the environment in 1960s America, viewed through the lens of the moon project, as opposed to a denigratory analysis of the craft from a modern perspective. Spoiler alert - all signs point to me finding that the environment was rarely, if even, considered when making decisions, and that the environmental impacts that followed were both considerable and diverse.
My work focuses on the decisions made which impacted environmental concerns and traces these environmental impacts across a range of situations, reflecting on the fact that these were not so much of an issue at the time and would not have been a major factor in decisions made during the Program. This places the thesis within the body of work focused on American history, notably in the difficult decade of the 1960s, alongside environmental history and STS by the nature of the topic, and treats the rocket as a piece of Americana. The one-time use of the craft is a symbol of the throw-away, consumerist culture of America in the 1960s, illustrating the dominant mindset of the era. This was a decade of abundance and consumption, with Apollo/Saturn being an allegory for this age.
In doing this, I hope that my work will provide an alternative view of a space vehicle which has had its story told in almost every other way. When the environment has been considered before within the context of the Apollo missions, it has largely focused on the positives that have resulted from the iconic Earthrise and Whole Earth photos taken during this mission. Yet at every stage of the vehicle’s life, decisions and actions had some consequence on various environments; some of these minimised environmental impact, whereas others resulted in greater environmental impact.
Through this project, I am also looking to rethink an American icon as a global product. The environmental impacts of the craft were felt across the world, but especially in the materials from which it was built. These were of differing scales in different places. The launches, for example, were small scale, short term environmental impacts felt only locally, but decisions made in the design process would have large scale environmental impacts on almost everything that followed. The sourcing of the aluminium used in the production of the craft had global environmental impacts, which were large in terms of both scale and duration, felt most keenly on the socio-economic and environmental levels in the local communities connected to the mining and manufacturing of this material. Parts and knowledge were sourced from beyond the borders of the United States, giving a different perspective on the vehicle, and the environmental impacts felt across the planet (and indeed also on the moon itself).
My work will show that the Apollo/Saturn craft impacted far more than the 38 astronauts who flew it or the nearly half-million who worked on it, thanks to the wide range and scope of environmental impacts the craft had on Planet Earth. It will view this from the perspective of those involved in the rocket at the time and the extent to which these environmental impacts were considered. This thesis will illustrate that Project Apollo fell at a junction of time where environmental concerns were not at the forefront and that this allowed NASA to take an approach of ‘whatever it takes’ to achieve the objective of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely before the decade was out. Fuelled by the intense competition of the Cold War and the Space Race, my work will ask the question of whether Apollo could have been carried out at any other time, or if this was a melting point of national drive without the burden of environmental consideration which meant that it was a distinctly 1960s America project.
BA (Hons) 20th Century History
Graduated in 2012
Dissertation - The Wartime Relationship Between His Majesty's Government and the British Broadcasting Corporation, 1939-1941
MA Advertising, Marketing and the Media
Graduated in 2017
Dissertation - As Good Today as It's Always Been: How corporate heritage is used in brand communication strategies
Pre-University Study:
The VI Form College, Colchester - International Baccalaureate - Class of 2009
East Bergholt High School - GCSEs - Class of 2007
East Bergholt Primary School - Class of 2002